Changes between Version 9 and Version 10 of Types

Timestamp:

07/13/09 14:00:05 (14 months ago)

Author:

lindquist (IP: 83.89.208.70)

Comment:

rephrase note on errors during integer promotion

Types

@@ -207 +207 @@
 '''RFC:''' why are there implicit conversions from character types to ints?  This has proven very tedious in some metaprogramming and function overloading situations with no apparent benefits.  
 
-If, after integer promotion, an integer value cannot be implicitly converted to another type which cannot represent the integer bit pattern, it is an error.  For example:
+When implicitly converting the product of integer promotion, the target type must be able to represent the value's bit pattern, otherwise it's an error.  For example:
 
 {{{